Embracing the Monster

Who is Patricia Piccinini?

In an article written by “THE AGE”  she is one of Tony Podesta's favorite artists.

https://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/art-and-design/when-art-and-politics-meet-20040506-gdxsnd.html

About the Podesta's art collection:

"They are always looking out for little-known artists, and believe some of the following will be on the first list in future: Britain's Darren Almond, Brazil's Janaina Tschape, Denmark's Mads Gamdrup, the Italian artist Loris Cecchini, and Patricia Piccinini, a Podesta favourite who represented Australia at the Venice Bienniale last year."

(did you catch that?  "little known artists")

Interestingly they also have a collection of Marina Abramovic's work, if you recall she is the artist that made it famous when she did performance art she called Spirit Cooking.

In an interview in the Guardian she said:

"then I got Lyme disease and I didn’t go for a while.” She smiles. “But I overcame the fear of ticks.” Overcoming is an Abramović theme. From her earliest work, she has explored physical and emotional endurance, confronting fear and exposing vulnerability. In her piece Rhythm 10 (1973), she stabbed a knife at speed between the spaces of her spread-out fingers; the following year, for Rhythm 0, she lay in a gallery in Naples alongside a table of 72 objects including chains, whips, a pistol and a mousetrap, and allowed visitors to do whatever they wanted with her (she still has scars from it). There was the time she lay in the centre of a burning five-pointed star (1974; she ended up losing consciousness) and the two weeks she spent living, on show, in three elevated boxes in a New York gallery in 2002."

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/oct/07/marina-abramovic-im-an-artist-not-a-satanist

Now just between you and me, this sounds a lot like many of the stories I have read about victims of satanic ritual abuse and or MKultra mind control programming. Is she working out her childhood abuse? Or is she just laughing in our faces, showing us exactly what these people are up to with their rituals?

The Podestas, Tony and his wife have a massive art collection, included among the work is a sculpture of a contorted male torso, the configuration is the same as that of a victim of Jeffrey Dahmer. Jeffrey Dahmer is the cannibal murderer who often mutilated the bodies of his victims, one victim was propped up so that his body  was in an arched position and the head is missing, or hidden into the mattress. This murder occurred in the late 80s, and the sculpture, called the Arch of Hysteria  designed by  French artist Louise Bourgeois was created in 1993.

Why would such a sculpture  have such an appeal to the Podestas?

not to get off topic too much but the Artist Louise Bourgeois has some curious sketches in his portfolio,  Of course every artist learns to draw nudes nothing unusual about that but this sketch is called

Father and Son   

and this one:

https://pedogate.world/pedo-art/arch-hysteria/

that child, well, his arms are really long aren't they?

As I began doing my search on Who Is Patricia Piccinini, I came across plenty of interesting descriptions of her art, which led me to want to KNOW what influenced her particular art style, and this is why I had to mention the Podestas.

From a Steemit article,

Her work is described as "reeks of demonic pedophilia, where women and children calmly accept it."

there are children sleeping cuddled with monsters, deformed human children that resemble more goat, chimp, or rat then a human child, and that the artist has a fixation on butts and genitals in general.

https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@gizmosia/art-podesta-admires-and-buys-you-may-never-sleep-well-again

But before I go any farther, I'd just like to mention that Tony Podesta is the brother of John Podesta.

John Podesta  will be senior adviser to Joe Biden  for international climate policy, this spring 2024 when John Kerry steps down.

He was a former counselor to Clinton and Obama.  

For those of us who remember Pizzagate, John podesta suddenly became  a person of interest among "conspiracy theorists." for child abduction, trafficking, and pedophilia, when his, and Hillary Clinton's emails were exposed during Weiner gate...

So it certainly raised eyebrows when his brother Tony's  ( actually John too) own art collections featuring what appears to be children in compromising and torturous situations.

Now let's get to why I titled this article Embracing the Monster.

Here is a sculpture by Patricia Piccinini, 

It's called Embracing the Monster

Artist Patricia Piccinini is most recognized for her hyper-realistic human-animal hybrid sculptures rendered in fiberglass, silicone, and sometimes hair.

https://ocula.com/artists/patricia-piccinini/

Her sculptures are made from silicone and "sometimes human hair".  That word silicone came up in my very first Substack post.  The Gollum is literally made of silicone/sand and Hebrew WORD MagiK. (CODE)

When I look at that sculpture called Embrace the Monster what am I looking at?  Is this strictly the imagination of the artist Patricia Piccinini?  What exactly is she portraying here?  This Monster looks a great deal like a human wouldn't you say?  A monster that may be a mix with a Gorilla perhaps?  Or maybe an Orangutang? 

"Though startling at first, a sense of tenderness and humour inhabit Patricia Piccinini's artworks." ocula

Maybe this is me just making a dumb assumption, but As I explored more of her art and her reasoning,(and her particular connection to the Podestas) I began to wonder if she was not privy to genetic experimentation, If she had possibly seen first-hand what is happening in those  Deep Underground Military Bases aka D.U.M.B.s

Then I found this article where Patricia speaks about her motivation in designing her sculptures;

Protein Lattice

Piccinini's long-standing interest in relationships is apparent in her early works, which drew their inspiration from scientific—particularly genetic—experiments of the day. In the photographic series 'Protein Lattice' (1997), young models pose alongside mice with what resembles a human ear on their backs. The hybrid animal—computer-generated in the images—is derived from the Vacanti mouse, named after the American researcher who famously grew ear-shaped cartilage on it in 1997. The artist's images show the women and mice close together, unperturbed by each other's presence, suggesting that, with the advancement of technology, humans and non-human beings are no longer as distant as previously considered.

'I think the overriding theme of my work of the last three decades has been how we as a society understand nature, as opposed to artifice,' she says. 'But within that there are some very strong themes around care. Like, what kinds of caring relationships are possible, and what do they look like? And I think this theme is very important when we think about the environment.'

'What kind of a relationship can we have with nature, when we've come to this point where we're in a real crisis?'

Is She trying to prepare Humanity for something???

Does she want us to cultivate compassion for Human hybrids? For grotesque and evil lab creations?   that possibly already exist?

Patricia Piccinini is known for her transgenic menagerie of disturbing, hyperrealistic creatures. Constructed from silicone and fiberglass, these hybrid sculptures investigate the potential rise of new and troubling developments through the advance of biotechnology and genetic manipulation, as in The Young Family (2002–03), a grotesque, wrinkly human-sow and her suckling offspring, made of silicone, acrylic, and materials like human hair and leather. Other figurative schemes include unexpected animal/human pairings, 

The Young Family

.

What comes to mind when you see this sculpture?  For me horror first, and then the question of whether these creatures actually exist?  Are they being hidden away in secret labs? Are they being experimented on?  Do they have emotions? Can they feel pain? 

Why would Patricia want to instill in us compassion by using these subjects in her "ART"?

She went on to say:

Environmentalists often use charismatic megafauna—creatures such as pandas, elephants, tigers, and whales—in their appeals, but Piccinini doesn't always make it so easy for us to align with nature.

'In my work, I do ask people to go on an emotional journey from aversion to care. And the way I try to achieve that is, I make a scenario or proposition, an artwork, a sculpture, that has something in it that is sort of repugnant or repulsive, and it pushes you away. And then there's something in it that pulls you in, on an emotional level, an ethical level, or an intellectual level.'

She is right about that!  "Piccinini doesn't always make it so easy for us to align with nature."    this is not Nature, but an abomination of Nature.  This is taking Nature and distorting it, to put it mildly

Patricia declares;

'I'm interested in valorising values like care, and I don't feel self-conscious about it anymore,' she says, 'because if we don't care, for things like children, like for the environment, things just collapse.'

Interesting, she is saying that if we don't care about the children, or the environment that things collapse, while showing us deformed figures of non-human beings with human characteristics.  I can't help but wonder if she is putting us on notice that evil has already done the job of bringing about the collapse of Nature, by creating monstrosities.

Valorizing means to bring validity to something.

Does she want us to bring validity to the creation of these creatures with human aspects but that are clearly not human.

Valorizing also means  to raise or fix the price or value of a commodity by artificial means especially by government action.

Hmmm human trafficking comes to mind, or could we be looking at something far more sinister, the new "commodity of beings" with human traits, born in litters.. like the sculpture Patricia designed below called,  The Litter.

What are these little beings?

The Great Sphinx of Giza is a limestone statue of a reclining sphinx, a mythical creature with the head of a human and the body of a lion.

and this is Patricia's Sphinx... something went terribly wrong here.

I simply can't even begin to imagine what they were experimenting with here, and what they had hoped to achieve.

In this sculpture are they looking into human ability to live in the deep ocean, Is this a mixing of a Dolphin and human

no fear of depths.

And now for something really disturbing.

Meet Graham:

https://www.meetgraham.com.au/

a video describing the project.

Would you like to redesign your body so that you could survive car crashes?

This is Graham and he is the only BODY  that can survive a car crash.  here is a 2 minute vid where Patricia clearly states at the end of the video, that in her making this Silicone creature, she sees it as

a challenge that is much more then just making a museum piece but IT CAN BE the vehicle for a very important idea.

https://www.meetgraham.com.au/

Wow what the hell does that mean?  a VEHICLE???  for a very important idea?

Is she trying to say that it is time to REDESIGN the Human Body in order to be indestructible?

What a project just to make people aware (as if they weren't already) that our current bodies are not built to survive car crashes.  Will we be tampered with and experimented on to create NEW HUMAN VEHICLES?

[3]

https://www.tac.vic.gov.au/about-the-tac/media-room/news-and-events/2016/introducing-graham

Graham is an educational tool that will serve the community for years to come as a reminder of why we need to develop a safer road system that will protect us when things go wrong,” Mr Calafiore said.

Wait! what?

The project cost over 100,000 to design Patricia's crash proof human,  and it was all just to get the message across that they need safer road systems?  

Part 2 will be posted shortly, as I was warned this stack is getting too long.